Victims 'gutted' by court's Pell decision
Australia's final arbiter has granted disgraced cardinal George Pell special leave to appeal his five convictions for molesting two choirboys in Melbourne.
The High Court of Australia this morning decided the 78-year-old who is currently serving a six-year jail term will have his appeal heard next year. It is rare for the High Court to grant an appeal.
The decision keeps Pell's chances for an early release from prison alive. He has been in prison since March this year.
He is within his rights to apply for bail, but the chances of bail being granted are very slim.
The most senior Catholic to be found guilty of child sex abuse crimes was not in the Canberra courtroom when the decision was handed down, nor did he appear via video link.
For those following the decision to grant George Pell leave to appeal his sexual abuse conviction, here is what was said in the High Court this morning. A date for the appeal hearing before the full bench is yet to be set but will likely be early 2020. https://t.co/6qYn8I4AH7 pic.twitter.com/ztfZDMQQ00— Olivia Caisley (@livcaisley) 12 November 2019
Instead, the news was relayed to him inside his cell at Melbourne Assessment Prison where he spends his days in protective custody.
A unanimous Victorian County Court jury in December found Pope Francis' former finance minister guilty of molesting two 13-year-old choirboys in Melbourne's St. Patrick's Cathedral in the late 1990s shortly after Pell became archbishop of Australia's second-largest city.
Today's decision has left the father of one of the two boys Pell molested "gutted".
The man, who's son died aged 31 after an accidental heroin overdose, said through his lawyer that he still blames Pell for his son's downward spiral.
"I have just spoken to our client who says he is 'gutted' by the High Court's decision to grant George Pell leave to appeal his conviction, Lisa Flynn from Shine Lawyers said.
Lisa Flynn, representing the father of Pell's deceased victim, says he is "gutted" by the High Court's decision to grant the disgraced cardinal special leave to appeal his five child sex abuse convictions. @newscomauHQ @ShineLawyers pic.twitter.com/8eWblBsWZx— Rohan Smith (@Ro_Smith) 13 November 2019
"This is a sad day for him. He was hopeful that it would all be over today as he continues to be re-traumatised by the unending legal action. His pain and suffering remains raw and unresolved.
"Our client holds George Pell responsible for his son's downhill spiral and subsequent fatal heroin overdose. He wants to see Pell behind bars where he has no contact with innocent children
"We know that many victims and survivors around the world are following this case very closely and we want to remind them that today's decision should not stop them in their fight for justice."
The victim's father earlier wrote a letter to the Vatican demanding answers to seven crucial questions.
Among the questions in the letter, sent to news.com.au, was the question: "Why has Pell kept his title as cardinal?"
The Vatican has repeatedly refused to comment on the case before Pell had exhausted all of his legal avenues for appeal.
The Victoria Court of Appeal in August rejected Pell's appeal in a 2-1 ruling.
Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt was predictably on the front foot after today's decision, questioning the credibility of the two judges who ruled against Pell.
"Their credibility is now on the line," he wrote.
Pell was sentenced to six years in prison in March and is no longer a member of Francis' Council of Cardinals or a Vatican official.
Pell's lawyers argued in their 12-page application for a High Court appeal that two state appeals court judges made two errors in dismissing his appeal in August.
The judges made a mistake by requiring Pell to prove the offending was impossible rather than putting the onus of proof on prosecutors, the lawyers said.
They also said the two judges made a mistake in finding the jury's guilty verdicts were reasonable.
Pell's lawyers argued there was reasonable doubt about whether opportunity existed for the crimes to have occurred.
Pell's lawyers also argue that changes in law over the years since the crimes were alleged have increased the difficulty in testing sexual assault allegations.
They argue Pell should be acquitted of all charges for several reasons, including inconsistencies in the complainant's version of events. But prosecutors argue there is no basis for the appeal, and the Victorian courts made no errors.
In their written submission to the High Court, prosecutors wrote Pell's legal team was asking High Court judges to apply established principles to the facts of the case, which were already carefully and thoroughly explored by the state appeals court.
Pell was largely convicted on the testimony of one victim. The second victim died of an accidental heroin overdose in 2014 when he was 31 years old without complaining that he had been abused.
The surviving victim said after Pell lost his appeal in August, "I just hope that it's all over now."
Clerical sexual abuse and the Catholic Church's handling of such cases worldwide have thrown Francis' papacy into turmoil.
In a little more than a year, the Pope has acknowledged he made "grave errors" in Chile's worst cover-up, Pell was convicted of abuse, a French cardinal was convicted of failing to report a paedophile, and a third cardinal, former US church leader Theodore McCarrick, was defrocked after a Vatican investigation determined he molested children and adults.
Pell must serve at least three years and eight months behind bars before he becomes eligible for parole.
As a convicted paedophile, he is provided with extra protection from other inmates and spends 23 hours a day in solitary confinement.
- with AAP