Arguments for and against the NPWS' policy



- it protects the land and wildlife from people who may unknowingly cause harm;

- takes into account cultural considerations, eg on Aboriginal heritage sites, which may otherwise be ignored;

- charges levied recognise the financial cost of conserving, maintaining and managing these resources;

- if photographers or film-makers are making profit from the area, they should contribute more to the upkeep

- the policy includes beaches, a popular spot for wedding photography ? so, if you hire a photographer for the day, a licence is required, but if your best friend takes the same photos, they're free. Does that make sense?

- our taxes and entry fees to parks already pay for the upkeep of the land;

- you can't 'own' a view, especially on public land; it's supposed to belong to everybody;

- it's just more bureaucratic red tape and revenue-raising by Government agencies.



Coffs Harbour's Most Influential - Part 11

premium_icon Coffs Harbour's Most Influential - Part 11

The Coffs Coast Advocate lists the people effecting change

STUNNING VIEW: Highway's biggest bridge ahead of schedule

premium_icon STUNNING VIEW: Highway's biggest bridge ahead of schedule

Bridge builder admires view from new engineering feat 50 years on

Police crackdown on shoplifters across Coffs Coast

Police crackdown on shoplifters across Coffs Coast

Shoplifters targeted at various shopping centres.

Local Partners